[{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org\/","@type":"Report","@id":"https:\/\/johnschmidtlaw.com\/j-p-t-v-commonwealth-defining-intent-and-purpose-in-kentucky-dependency-cases\/#Report","mainEntityOfPage":"https:\/\/johnschmidtlaw.com\/j-p-t-v-commonwealth-defining-intent-and-purpose-in-kentucky-dependency-cases\/","headline":"J.P.T. v. Commonwealth: Defining Intent and Purpose in Kentucky Dependency Cases","name":"J.P.T. v. Commonwealth: Defining Intent and Purpose in Kentucky Dependency Cases","description":"The Kentucky Court of Appeals decision in\u00a0J.P.T. v. Commonwealth, 689 S.W.3d 149 (Ky. Ct. App. 2024), sheds light on critical issues in dependency, neglect, and abuse (DNA) cases. The court examined the nuances of “intent” and “purpose” under Kentucky Revised Statutes (KRS) 600.020(1)(a), ultimately affirming the family court\u2019s determination of abuse. This blog unpacks the […]","datePublished":"2025-02-28","dateModified":"2025-02-28","author":{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/johnschmidtlaw.com\/author\/knight1\/#Person","name":"John Schmidt","url":"https:\/\/johnschmidtlaw.com\/author\/knight1\/","identifier":1,"image":{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5757740a61d4688d51fb8bfa6b5aebda1790e512994a58cf078a8b0a2eb38432?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5757740a61d4688d51fb8bfa6b5aebda1790e512994a58cf078a8b0a2eb38432?s=96&d=mm&r=g","height":96,"width":96}},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Law Offices of John Schmidt & Associates, PLLC","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/johnschmidtlaw.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Logo-Law-Offices-of-John-Schmidt-Associates-PLLC.jpg","url":"https:\/\/johnschmidtlaw.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Logo-Law-Offices-of-John-Schmidt-Associates-PLLC.jpg","width":342,"height":70}},"url":"https:\/\/johnschmidtlaw.com\/j-p-t-v-commonwealth-defining-intent-and-purpose-in-kentucky-dependency-cases\/"},{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/johnschmidtlaw.com\/j-p-t-v-commonwealth-defining-intent-and-purpose-in-kentucky-dependency-cases\/#BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"J.P.T. v. Commonwealth: Defining Intent and Purpose in Kentucky Dependency Cases","item":"https:\/\/johnschmidtlaw.com\/j-p-t-v-commonwealth-defining-intent-and-purpose-in-kentucky-dependency-cases\/#breadcrumbitem"}]}]